You can take part in this work. Join the working group's discussion list.
Web designers! We have a FAQ , a forum , and a help mailing list for you!
© Copyright 2004-2008 Apple Computer, Inc., Mozilla Foundation, and Opera Software ASA.
You are granted a license to use, reproduce and create derivative works of this document.
This specification evolves HTML and its related APIs to ease the authoring of Web-based applications. Additions include the context menus, a direct-mode graphics canvas, inline popup windows, and server-sent events. Heavy emphasis is placed on keeping the language backwards compatible with existing legacy user agents and on keeping user agents backwards compatible with existing legacy documents.
This is a work in progress! This document is changing on a daily if not hourly basis in response to comments and as a general part of its development process. Comments are very welcome, please send them to whatwg@whatwg.org . Thank you.
The current focus is in responding to the outstanding feedback . (There is a chart showing current progress.)
Implementors should be aware that this specification is not stable. Implementors who are not taking part in the discussions are likely to find the specification changing out from under them in incompatible ways. Vendors interested in implementing this specification before it eventually reaches the call for implementations should join the WHATWG mailing list and take part in the discussions.
This specification is also being produced by the W3C HTML WG . The two specifications are identical from the table of contents onwards.
This specification is intended to replace (be the new version of) what was previously the HTML4, XHTML 1.x, and DOM2 HTML specifications.
Different parts of this specification are at different levels of maturity.
Some of the more major known issues are marked
like this. There are many other issues that have been raised as
well; the issues given in this document are not the only known
issues! There are also some spec-wide issues that have not yet been
addressed: case-sensitivity is a very poorly handled topic right
now, and the firing of events needs to be unified (right now some
bubble, some don't, they all use different text to fire events,
etc). It would also be nice to unify the rules on downloading
content when attributes change (e.g. src
attributes) - should they initiate downloads when the element
immediately, is inserted in the document, when active scripts end,
etc. This matters e.g. if an attribute is set twice in a row (does
it hit the network twice).
a elementq elementcite elementem elementstrong elementsmall elementmark elementdfn elementabbr elementtime elementprogress elementmeter elementcode elementvar elementsamp elementkbd elementsub and sup elementsspan elementi elementb elementbdo elementfigure elementimg elementiframe elementembed elementobject elementparam elementvideo element
audio element
source elementcanvas element
canvas elementsmap elementarea elementtable elementcaption elementcolgroup elementcol elementtbody elementthead elementtfoot elementtr elementtd elementth elementtd and th
elementsform elementfieldset elementinput elementbutton elementlabel elementselect elementdatalist elementoptgroup elementoption elementtextarea elementoutput elementdetails elementdatagrid element
datagrid data modeldatagrid elementdatagridcommand elementmenu element
alternate "archives "author "bookmark "contact "external "feed "help "icon "license "nofollow "noreferrer "pingback "prefetch "search "stylesheet "sidebar "tag "contenteditable
attribute
This section is non-normative.
The World Wide Web's markup language has always been HTML. HTML was primarily designed as a language for semantically describing scientific documents, although its general design and adaptations over the years has enabled it to be used to describe a number of other types of documents.
The main area that has not been adequately addressed by HTML is a vague subject referred to as Web Applications. This specification attempts to rectify this, while at the same time updating the HTML specifications to address issues raised in the past few years.
This section is non-normative.
This specification is limited to providing a semantic-level markup language and associated semantic-level scripting APIs for authoring accessible pages on the Web ranging from static documents to dynamic applications.
The scope of this specification does not include providing mechanisms for media-specific customisation of presentation (although default rendering rules for Web browsers are included at the end of this specification, and several mechanisms for hooking into CSS are provided as part of the language).
The scope of this specification does not include documenting
every HTML or DOM feature supported by Web browsers. Browsers
support many features that are considered to be very bad for
accessibility or that are otherwise inappropriate. For example, the
blink element is clearly presentational and authors
wishing to cause text to blink should instead use CSS.
The scope of this specification is not to describe an entire operating system. In particular, hardware configuration software, image manipulation tools, and applications that users would be expected to use with high-end workstations on a daily basis are out of scope. In terms of applications, this specification is targeted specifically at applications that would be expected to be used by users on an occasional basis, or regularly but from disparate locations, with low CPU requirements. For instance online purchasing systems, searching systems, games (especially multiplayer online games), public telephone books or address books, communications software (e-mail clients, instant messaging clients, discussion software), document editing software, etc.
For sophisticated cross-platform applications, there already exist several proprietary solutions (such as Mozilla's XUL, Adobe's Flash, or Microsoft's Silverlight). These solutions are evolving faster than any standards process could follow, and the requirements are evolving even faster. These systems are also significantly more complicated to specify, and are orders of magnitude more difficult to achieve interoperability with, than the solutions described in this document. Platform-specific solutions for such sophisticated applications (for example the MacOS X Core APIs) are even further ahead.
This section is non-normative.
This specification represents a new version of HTML4 and XHTML1, along with a new version of the associated DOM2 HTML API. Migration from HTML4 or XHTML1 to the format and APIs described in this specification should in most cases be straightforward, as care has been taken to ensure that backwards-compatibility is retained.
This specification will eventually supplant Web Forms 2.0 as well. [WF2]
This section is non-normative.
XHTML2 [XHTML2] defines a new HTML vocabulary with better features for hyperlinks, multimedia content, annotating document edits, rich metadata, declarative interactive forms, and describing the semantics of human literary works such as poems and scientific papers.
However, it lacks elements to express the semantics of many of the non-document types of content often seen on the Web. For instance, forum sites, auction sites, search engines, online shops, and the like, do not fit the document metaphor well, and are not covered by XHTML2.
This specification aims to extend HTML so that it is also suitable in these contexts.
XHTML2 and this specification use different namespaces and therefore can both be implemented in the same XML processor.
This section is non-normative.
This specification is independent of the various proprietary UI languages that various vendors provide. As an open, vendor-neutral language, HTML provides for a solution to the same problems without the risk of vendor lock-in.
This section is non-normative.
This specification is divided into the following important sections:
There are also a couple of appendices, defining rendering rules for Web browsers and listing areas that are out of scope for this specification.
This specification should be read like all other specifications. First, it should be read cover-to-cover, multiple times. Then, it should be read backwards at least once. Then it should be read by picking random sections from the contents list and following all the cross-references.
All diagrams, examples, and notes in this specification are non-normative, as are all sections explicitly marked non-normative. Everything else in this specification is normative.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in the normative parts of this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119. For readability, these words do not appear in all uppercase letters in this specification. [RFC2119]
Requirements phrased in the imperative as part of algorithms (such as "strip any leading space characters" or "return false and abort these steps") are to be interpreted with the meaning of the key word ("must", "should", "may", etc) used in introducing the algorithm.
This specification describes the conformance criteria for user agents (relevant to implementors) and documents (relevant to authors and authoring tool implementors).
There is no implied relationship between document conformance requirements and implementation conformance requirements. User agents are not free to handle non-conformant documents as they please; the processing model described in this specification applies to implementations regardless of the conformity of the input documents.
User agents fall into several (overlapping) categories with different conformance requirements.
Web browsers that support XHTML must process elements and attributes from the HTML namespace found in XML documents as described in this specification, so that users can interact with them, unless the semantics of those elements have been overridden by other specifications.
A conforming XHTML processor would, upon finding
an XHTML script element in an
XML document, execute the script contained in that element.
However, if the element is found within an XSLT transformation
sheet (assuming the UA also supports XSLT), then the processor
would instead treat the script
element as an opaque element that forms part of the transform.
Web browsers that support HTML must process documents labeled as
text/html as described in this specification, so that
users can interact with them.
User agents that process HTML and XHTML documents purely to render non-interactive versions of them must comply to the same conformance criteria as Web browsers, except that they are exempt from requirements regarding user interaction.
Typical examples of non-interactive presentation user agents are printers (static UAs) and overhead displays (dynamic UAs). It is expected that most static non-interactive presentation user agents will also opt to lack scripting support .
A non-interactive but dynamic presentation UA would still execute scripts, allowing forms to be dynamically submitted, and so forth. However, since the concept of "focus" is irrelevant when the user cannot interact with the document, the UA would not need to support any of the focus-related DOM APIs.
Implementations that do not support scripting (or which have their scripting features disabled ) are exempt from supporting the events and DOM interfaces mentioned in this specification. For the parts of this specification that are defined in terms of an events model or in terms of the DOM, such user agents must still act as if events and the DOM were supported.
Scripting can form an integral part of an application. Web browsers that do not support scripting, or that have scripting disabled, might be unable to fully convey the author's intent.
Conformance checkers must verify that a document conforms to the
applicable conformance criteria described in this specification.
Conformance checkers are exempt from detecting errors that require
interpretation of the author's intent (for example, while a
document is non-conforming if the content of a blockquote element is not a quote,
conformance checkers do not have to check that blockquote elements only contain quoted
material).
Conformance checkers must check that the input document conforms when scripting is disabled , and should also check that the input document conforms when scripting is enabled . (This is only a "SHOULD" and not a "MUST" requirement because it has been proven to be impossible. [HALTINGPROBLEM] )
The term "HTML5 validator" can be used to refer to a conformance checker that itself conforms to the applicable requirements of this specification.
XML DTDs cannot express all the conformance requirements of this specification. Therefore, a validating XML processor and a DTD cannot constitute a conformance checker. Also, since neither of the two authoring formats defined in this specification are applications of SGML, a validating SGML system cannot constitute a conformance checker either.
To put it another way, there are three types of conformance criteria:
A conformance checker must check for the first two. A simple DTD-based validator only checks for the first class of errors and is therefore not a conforming conformance checker according to this specification.
Applications and tools that process HTML and XHTML documents for reasons other than to either render the documents or check them for conformance should act in accordance to the semantics of the documents that they process.
A tool that generates document outlines but increases the nesting level for each paragraph and does not increase the nesting level for each section would not be conforming.
Authoring tools and markup generators must generate conforming documents. Conformance criteria that apply to authors also apply to authoring tools, where appropriate.
Authoring tools are exempt from the strict requirements of using elements only for their specified purpose, but only to the extent that authoring tools are not yet able to determine author intent.
For example, it is not conforming to use an
address element for arbitrary
contact information; that element can only be used for marking up
contact information for the author of the document or section.
However, since an authoring tools is likely unable to determine the
difference, an authoring tool is exempt from that requirement.
In terms of conformance checking, an editor is therefore required to output documents that conform to the same extent that a conformance checker will verify.
When an authoring tool is used to edit a non-conforming document, it may preserve the conformance errors in sections of the document that were not edited during the editing session (i.e. an editing tool is allowed to round-trip errorneous content). However, an authoring tool must not claim that the output is conformant if errors have been so preserved.
Authoring tools are expected to come in two broad varieties: tools that work from structure or semantic data, and tools that work on a What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get media-specific editing basis (WYSIWYG).
The former is the preferred mechanism for tools that author HTML, since the structure in the source information can be used to make informed choices regarding which HTML elements and attributes are most appropriate.
However, WYSIWYG tools are legitimate. WYSIWYG tools should use
elements they know are appropriate, and should not use elements
that they do not know to be appropriate. This might in certain
extreme cases mean limiting the use of flow elements to just a few
elements, like div , b , i , and
span and making liberal use of the
style
attribute.
All authoring tools, whether WYSIWYG or not, should make a best effort attempt at enabling users to create well-structured, semantically rich, media-independent content.
Some conformance requirements are phrased as requirements on elements, attributes, methods or objects. Such requirements fall into two categories: those describing content model restrictions, and those describing implementation behavior. The former category of requirements are requirements on documents and authoring tools. The second category are requirements on user agents.
Conformance requirements phrased as algorithms or specific steps may be implemented in any manner, so long as the end result is equivalent. (In particular, the algorithms defined in this specification are intended to be easy to follow, and not intended to be performant.)
User agents may impose implementation-specific limits on otherwise unconstrained inputs, e.g. to prevent denial of service attacks, to guard against running out of memory, or to work around platform-specific limitations.
For compatibility with existing content and prior specifications, this specification describes two authoring formats: one based on XML (referred to as XHTML5 ), and one using a custom format inspired by SGML (referred to as HTML5 ). Implementations may support only one of these two formats, although supporting both is encouraged.
Such XML documents may contain a DOCTYPE if
desired, but this is not required to conform to this
specification.
According to the XML specification, XML processors are not guaranteed to process the external DTD subset referenced in the DOCTYPE. This means, for example, that using entities for characters in XHTML documents is unsafe (except for <, >, &, " and '). For interoperability, authors are advised to avoid optional features of XML.
The language in this specification assumes that the user agent expands all entity references, and therefore does not include entity reference nodes in the DOM. If user agents do include entity reference nodes in the DOM, then user agents must handle them as if they were fully expanded when implementing this specification. For example, if a requirement talks about an element's child text nodes, then any text nodes that are children of an entity reference that is a child of that element would be used as well. Entity references to unknown entities must be treated as if they contained just an empty text node for the purposes of the algorithms defined in this specification.
A lot of arrays/lists/ collection s in this spec assume zero-based indexes but use the term " index th" liberally. We should define those to be zero-based and be clearer about this.
Unless otherwise specified, if a DOM attribute that is a
floating point number type ( float ) is
assigned an Infinity or Not-a-Number value, a NOT_SUPPORTED_ERR exception must be raised.
Unless otherwise specified, if a method with an argument that is
a floating point number type ( float ) is
passed an Infinity or Not-a-Number value, a NOT_SUPPORTED_ERR exception must be raised.
Unless otherwise specified, if a method is passed fewer
arguments than is defined for that method in its IDL definition, a
NOT_SUPPORTED_ERR exception must be
raised.
Unless otherwise specified, if a method is passed more arguments than is defined for that method in its IDL definition, the excess arguments must be ignored.
This specification relies on several other underlying specifications.
Implementations that support XHTML5 must support some version of XML, as well as its corresponding namespaces specification, because XHTML5 uses an XML serialisation with namespaces. [XML] [XMLNAMES]
User agents must follow the rules given by XML Base to resolve relative URIs in HTML and XHTML fragments. That is the mechanism used in this specification for resolving relative URIs in DOM trees. [XMLBASE]
It is possible for xml:base attributes to be present even in
HTML fragments, as such attributes can be added dynamically using
script.
Implementations must support some version of DOM Core and DOM Events, because this specification is defined in terms of the DOM, and some of the features are defined as extensions to the DOM Core interfaces. [DOM3CORE] [DOM3EVENTS]
Implementations that use ECMAScript to implement the APIs defined in this specification must implement them in a manner consistent with the ECMAScript Bindings defined in the Web IDL specification, as this specification uses that specification's terminology. [WebIDL]
Implementations must support some version of the Media Queries language. However, when applying the rules of the Media Queries specification to media queries found in content attributes of HTML elements , user agents must act as if all U+000B LINE TABULATION characters in the attribute were in fact U+0020 SPACE characters. This is required to provide a consistent processing of space characters in HTML. [MQ]
This specification does not require support of any particular network transport protocols, style sheet language, scripting language, or any of the DOM and WebAPI specifications beyond those described above. However, the language described by this specification is biased towards CSS as the styling language, ECMAScript as the scripting language, and HTTP as the network protocol, and several features assume that those languages and protocols are in use.
This specification might have certain additional requirements on character encodings, image formats, audio formats, and video formats in the respective sections.
Some elements are defined in terms of their DOM textContent attribute. This is an
attribute defined on the Node interface in DOM3 Core.
[DOM3CORE]
Should textContent be defined differently for dir="" and <bdo> ? Should we come up with an alternative to textContent that handles those and other things, like alt=""?
The interface DOMTimeStamp is defined in DOM3
Core. [DOM3CORE]
The term activation behavior is used as defined in the DOM3 Events specification. [DOM3EVENTS] At the time of writing, DOM3 Events hadn't yet been updated to define that phrase.
The rules for handling alternative style sheets are defined in the CSS object model specification. [CSSOM]
Certain features are defined in terms of CSS <color>
values. When the CSS value currentColor is
specified in this context, the "computed value of the 'color'
property" for the purposes of determining the computed value of the
currentColor keyword is the computed value of
the 'color' property on the element in question. [CSS3COLOR]
If a canvas gradient's addColorStop() method is called with the
currentColor keyword as the color, then the
computed value of the 'color' property on the canvas element is the one that is used.
This specification refers to both HTML and XML attributes and DOM attributes, often in the same context. When it is not clear which is being referred to, they are referred to as content attributes for HTML and XML attributes, and DOM attributes for those from the DOM. Similarly, the term "properties" is used for both ECMAScript object properties and CSS properties. When these are ambiguous they are qualified as object properties and CSS properties respectively.
To ease migration from HTML to XHTML, UAs
conforming to this specification will place elements in HTML in the
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml namespace, at least for
the purposes of the DOM and CSS. The term " elements in the HTML namespace ", or " HTML elements " for short, when used in this
specification, thus refers to both HTML and XHTML elements.
Unless otherwise stated, all elements defined or mentioned in
this specification are in the
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml namespace, and all
attributes defined or mentioned in this specification have no
namespace (they are in the per-element partition).
The term HTML documents is sometimes used in contrast with XML documents to specifically mean documents that were parsed using an HTML parser (as opposed to using an XML parser or created purely through the DOM).
Generally, when the specification states that a feature applies to HTML or XHTML, it also includes the other. When a feature specifically only applies to one of the two languages, it is called out by explicitly stating that it does not apply to the other format, as in "for HTML, ... (this does not apply to XHTML)".
This specification uses the term document to refer to any use of HTML, ranging from short static documents to long essays or reports with rich multimedia, as well as to fully-fledged interactive applications.
For readability, the term URI is used to refer to both ASCII URIs and Unicode IRIs, as those terms are defined by RFC 3986 and RFC 3987 respectively. On the rare occasions where IRIs are not allowed but ASCII URIs are, this is called out explicitly. [RFC3986] [RFC3987]
The term root element , when not explicitly qualified as referring to the document's root element, means the furthest ancestor element node of whatever node is being discussed, or the node itself if it has no ancestors. When the node is a part of the document, then that is indeed the document's root element; however, if the node is not currently part of the document tree, the root element will be an orphaned node.
An element is said to have been inserted into a document when its root element changes and is now the document's root element .
The term tree order means a
pre-order, depth-first traversal of DOM nodes involved (through the
parentNode / childNodes
relationship).
When it is stated that some element or attribute is ignored , or treated as some other value, or handled as if it was something else, this refers only to the processing of the node after it is in the DOM. A user agent must not mutate the DOM in such situations.
When an XML name, such as an attribute or element name, is
referred to in the form prefix :
localName , as in xml:id or
svg:rect , it refers to a name with the local name
localName and the namespace given by the
prefix, as defined by the following table:
xmlhttp://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespacehtmlhttp://www.w3.org/1999/xhtmlsvghttp://www.w3.org/2000/svgFor simplicity, terms such as shown , displayed , and visible might sometimes be used when referring to the way a document is rendered to the user. These terms are not meant to imply a visual medium; they must be considered to apply to other media in equivalent ways.
DOM interfaces defined in this specification use Web IDL. User agents must implement these interfaces as defined by the Web IDL specification. [WEBIDL]
The construction "a Foo object", where
Foo is actually an interface, is sometimes used
instead of the more accurate "an object implementing the interface
Foo ".
A DOM attribute is said to be getting when its value is being retrieved (e.g. by author script), and is said to be setting when a new value is assigned to it.
If a DOM object is said to be live , then that means that any attributes returning that object must always return the same object (not a new object each time), and the attributes and methods on that object must operate on the actual underlying data, not a snapshot of the data.
The terms fire and dispatch are used interchangeably in the context of events, as in the DOM Events specifications. [DOM3EVENTS]
The term text node refers to any
Text node, including CDATASection nodes;
specifically, any Node with node type TEXT_NODE (3) or CDATA_SECTION_NODE
(4). [DOM3CORE]
Some of the algorithms in this specification, for historical reasons, require the user agent to pause until some condition has been met. While a user agent is paused, it must ensure that no scripts execute (e.g. no event handlers, no timers, etc). User agents should remain responsive to user input while paused, however, albeit without letting the user interact with Web pages where that would involve invoking any script.
This section is non-normative.
This specification defines an abstract language for describing documents and applications, and some APIs for interacting with in-memory representations of resources that use this language.
The in-memory representation is known as "DOM5 HTML", or "the DOM" for short.
There are various concrete syntaxes that can be used to transmit resources that use this abstract language, two of which are defined in this specification.
The first such concrete syntax is "HTML5". This is the format
recommended for most authors. It is compatible with all legacy Web
browsers. If a document is transmitted with the MIME type
text/html , then it will be processed as an
"HTML5" document by Web browsers.
The second concrete syntax uses XML, and is known as "XHTML5".
When a document is transmitted with an XML MIME type, such as
application/xhtml+xml , then it is processed
by an XML processor by Web browsers, and treated as an "XHTML5"
document. Authors are reminded that the processing for XML and HTML
differs; in particular, even minor syntax errors will prevent an
XML document from being rendered fully, whereas they would be
ignored in the "HTML5" syntax.
The "DOM5 HTML", "HTML5", and "XHTML5" representations cannot
all represent the same content. For example, namespaces cannot be
represented using "HTML5", but they are supported in "DOM5 HTML"
and "XHTML5". Similarly, documents that use the noscript feature can be represented using
"HTML5", but cannot be represented with "XHTML5" and "DOM5 HTML".
Comments that contain the string " --> "
can be represented in "DOM5 HTML" but not in "HTML5" and "XHTML5".
And so forth.
The Document Object Model (DOM) is a representation — a model — of a document and its content. [DOM3CORE] The DOM is not just an API; the conformance criteria of HTML implementations are defined, in this specification, in terms of operations on the DOM.
This specification defines the language represented in the DOM
by features together called DOM5 HTML. DOM5 HTML consists of DOM
Core Document nodes and DOM Core Element
nodes, along with text nodes and other content.
Elements in the DOM represent things; that is, they have intrinsic meaning , also known as semantics.
For example, an ol element represents an ordered list.
In addition, documents and elements in the DOM host APIs that extend the DOM Core APIs, providing new features to application developers using DOM5 HTML.
Every XML and HTML document in an HTML UA is represented by a
Document object. [DOM3CORE]
Document objects are assumed to be XML documents unless they are flagged as
being HTML documents when they are created.
Whether a document is an HTML document or an XML document affects the behavior of
certain APIs, as well as a few CSS rendering rules. [CSS21]
A Document object created by the
createDocument() API on the
DOMImplementation object is initially an XML document , but can
be made into an HTML
document by calling document.open() on it.
All Document objects (in user agents implementing
this specification) must also implement the HTMLDocument interface, available using
binding-specific methods. (This is the case whether or not the
document in question is an HTML document or indeed whether it contains
any HTML elements at all.)
Document objects must also implement the
document-level interface of any other namespaces found in the
document that the UA supports. For example, if an HTML
implementation also supports SVG, then the Document
object must implement HTMLDocument and
SVGDocument .
Because the HTMLDocument interface is now obtained
using binding-specific casting methods instead of simply being the
primary interface of the document object, it is no longer defined
as inheriting from Document .
interface HTMLDocument {
// Resource metadata management
[PutForwards=href] readonly attribute Location location;
readonly attribute DOMString URL;
attribute DOMString domain;
readonly attribute DOMString referrer;
attribute DOMString cookie;
readonly attribute DOMString lastModified;
readonly attribute DOMString compatMode;
attribute DOMString charset;
readonly attribute DOMString characterSet;
readonly attribute DOMString defaultCharset;
readonly attribute DOMString readyState;
// DOM tree accessors
attribute DOMString title;
attribute DOMString dir;
attribute HTMLElement body;
readonly attribute HTMLCollection images;
readonly attribute HTMLCollection embeds;
readonly attribute HTMLCollection plugins;
readonly attribute HTMLCollection links;
readonly attribute HTMLCollection forms;
readonly attribute HTMLCollection anchors;
readonly attribute HTMLCollection scripts;
NodeList getElementsByName(in DOMString elementName);
NodeList getElementsByClassName(in DOMString classNames);
// Dynamic markup insertion
attribute DOMString innerHTML;
HTMLDocument open();
HTMLDocument open(in DOMString type);
HTMLDocument open(in DOMString type, in DOMString replace);
Window open(in DOMString url, in DOMString name, in DOMString features);
Window open(in DOMString url, in DOMString name, in DOMString features, in boolean replace);
void close();
void write(in DOMString text);
void writeln(in DOMString text);
// Interaction
readonly attribute Element activeElement;
readonly attribute boolean hasFocus;
// Commands
readonly attribute HTMLCollection commands;
// Editing
attribute boolean designMode;
boolean execCommand(in DOMString commandId);
boolean execCommand(in DOMString commandId, in boolean showUI);
boolean execCommand(in DOMString commandId, in boolean showUI, in DOMString value);
boolean queryCommandEnabled(in DOMString commandId);
boolean queryCommandIndeterm(in DOMString commandId);
boolean queryCommandState(in DOMString commandId);
boolean queryCommandSupported(in DOMString commandId);
DOMString queryCommandValue(in DOMString commandId);
Selection getSelection();
};
Since the HTMLDocument
interface holds methods and attributes related to a number of
disparate features, the members of this interface are described in
various different sections.
User agents must raise a security
exception whenever any of the members of an HTMLDocument object are accessed by
scripts whose effective script origin is
not the same as the
Document 's effective script
origin .
The URL attribute must return
the document's address .
The referrer attribute must
return either the URI of the active document
of the source browsing context at the time
the navigation was started (that is, the page which navigated the browsing context to the current document), or the
empty string if there is no such originating page, or if the UA has
been configured not to report referrers in this case, or if the
navigation was initiated for a hyperlink
with a noreferrer keyword.
In the case of HTTP, the referrer DOM
attribute will match the Referer (sic) header
that was sent when fetching the current page.
Typically user agents are configured to not report
referrers in the case where the referrer uses an encrypted protocol
and the current page does not (e.g. when navigating from an
https: page to an http:
page).
The cookie attribute must, on
getting, return the same string as the value of the Cookie HTTP header it would include if fetching the
resource indicated by the document's address over
HTTP, as per RFC 2109 section 4.3.4. [RFC2109]
On setting, the cookie attribute must cause the user agent to
act as it would when processing cookies if it had just attempted to
fetch the document's address over HTTP, and had
received a response with a Set-Cookie header whose
value was the specified value, as per RFC 2109 sections 4.3.1,
4.3.2, and 4.3.3. [RFC2109]
Since the cookie
attribute is accessible across frames, the path restrictions on
cookies are only a tool to help manage which cookies are sent to
which parts of the site, and are not in any way a security
feature.
The lastModified
attribute, on getting, must return the date and time of the
Document 's source file's last modification, in the
user's local timezone, in the following format:
All the numeric components above, other than the year, must be given as two digits in the range U+0030 DIGIT ZERO to U+0039 DIGIT NINE representing the number in base ten, zero-padded if necessary.
The Document 's source file's last modification
date and time must be derived from relevant features of the
networking protocols used, e.g. from the value of the HTTP
Last-Modified header of the document, or from
metadata in the filesystem for local files. If the last
modification date and time are not known, the attribute must return
the string 01/01/1970 00:00:00 .
A Document is always set to one of three modes:
no quirks mode , the default; quirks mode , used typically for legacy documents;
and limited quirks mode , also known as
"almost standards" mode. The mode is only ever changed from the
default by the HTML parser , based on the
presence, absence, or value of the DOCTYPE string.
The compatMode DOM
attribute must return the literal string " CSS1Compat " unless the document has been set to quirks mode by the HTML parser
, in which case it must instead return the literal string "
BackCompat ".
As far as parsing goes, the quirks I know of are:
Documents have an associated character encoding . When a
Document object is created, the document's character encoding must be initialised
to UTF-16. Various algorithms during page loading affect this
value, as does the charset setter. [IANACHARSET]
The charset DOM attribute
must, on getting, return the preferred MIME name of the document's character encoding . On setting, if
the new value is an IANA-registered alias for a character encoding,
the document's character encoding must be
set to that character encoding. (Otherwise, nothing happens.)
The characterSet DOM
attribute must, on getting, return the preferred MIME name of the
document's character encoding .
The defaultCharset DOM
attribute must, on getting, return the preferred MIME name of a
character encoding, possibly the user's default encoding, or an
encoding associated with the user's current geographical location,
or any arbitrary encoding name.
Each document has a current document
readiness . When a Document object is created,
it must have its current document readiness
set to the string "loading". Various algorithms during page loading
affect this value. When the value is set, the user agent must
fire a simple event called readystatechanged at the
Document object.
The readyState DOM
attribute must, on getting, return the current
document readiness .
The nodes representing HTML elements in the DOM must implement, and expose to scripts, the interfaces listed for them in the relevant sections of this specification. This includes XHTML elements in XML documents , even when those documents are in another context (e.g. inside an XSLT transform).
The basic interface, from which all the HTML elements ' interfaces inherit, and which
must be used by elements that have no additional requirements, is
the HTMLElement
interface.
interface HTMLElement : Element { // DOM tree accessors NodeList getElementsByClassName(in DOMString classNames); // dynamic markup insertion attribute DOMString innerHTML; // metadata attributes attribute DOMString id; attribute DOMString title; attribute DOMString lang; attribute DOMString dir; attribute DOMString className; readonly attribute DOMTokenList classList; readonly attribute DOMStringMap dataset; // interaction attribute boolean irrelevant; attribute long tabIndex; void click(); void focus(); void blur(); void scrollIntoView(); void scrollIntoView(in boolean top); // commands attribute HTMLMenuElement contextMenu; // editing attribute boolean draggable; attribute DOMString contentEditable; readonly attribute DOMString isContentEditable; // styling readonly attribute CSSStyleDeclaration style; // data templates attribute DOMString template; readonly attribute HTMLDataTemplateElement templateElement; attribute DOMString ref; readonly attribute Node refNode; attribute DOMString registrationMark; readonly attribute DocumentFragment originalContent; // event handler DOM attributes attribute EventListener onabort; attribute EventListener onbeforeunload; attribute EventListener onblur; attribute EventListener onchange; attribute EventListener onclick; attribute EventListener oncontextmenu; attribute EventListener ondblclick; attribute EventListener ondrag; attribute EventListener ondragend; attribute EventListener ondragenter; attribute EventListener ondragleave; attribute EventListener ondragover; attribute EventListener ondragstart; attribute EventListener ondrop; attribute EventListener onerror; attribute EventListener onfocus; attribute EventListener onkeydown; attribute EventListener onkeypress; attribute EventListener onkeyup; attribute EventListener onload; attribute EventListener onmessage; attribute EventListener onmousedown; attribute EventListener onmousemove; attribute EventListener onmouseout; attribute EventListener onmouseover; attribute EventListener onmouseup; attribute EventListener onmousewheel; attribute EventListener onresize; attribute EventListener onscroll; attribute EventListener onselect; attribute EventListener onstorage; attribute EventListener onsubmit; attribute EventListener onunload; };
As with the HTMLDocument interface, the
HTMLElement interface holds
methods and attributes related to a number of disparate features,
and the members of this interface are therefore described in
various different sections of this specification.
Some DOM attributes are defined to reflect a particular content attribute . This means that on getting, the DOM attribute returns the current value of the content attribute, and on setting, the DOM attribute changes the value of the content attribute to the given value.
If a reflecting DOM attribute is a DOMString
attribute whose content attribute is defined to contain a URI, then
on getting, the DOM attribute must return the value of the content
attribute, resolved to an absolute URI, and on setting, must set
the content attribute to the specified literal value. If the
content attribute is absent, the DOM attribute must return the
default value, if the content attribute has one, or else the empty
string.
If a reflecting DOM attribute is a DOMString
attribute whose content attribute is defined to contain one or more
URIs, then on getting, the DOM attribute must split the content attribute on
spaces and return the concatenation of each token URI,
resolved to an absolute URI, with a single U+0020 SPACE character
between each URI; if the content attribute is absent, the DOM
attribute must return the default value, if the content attribute
has one, or else the empty string. On setting, the DOM attribute
must set the content attribute to the specified literal value.
If a reflecting DOM attribute is a DOMString whose
content attribute is an enumerated
attribute , and the DOM attribute is limited
to only known values , then, on getting, the DOM attribute
must return the conforming value associated with the state the
attribute is in (in its canonical case), or the empty string if the
attribute is in a state that has no associated keyword value; and
on setting, if the new value case-insensitively matches one of the
keywords given for that attribute, then the content attribute must
be set to the conforming value associated with the state that the
attribute would be in if set to the given new value, otherwise, if
the new value is the empty string, then the content attribute must
be removed, otherwise, the setter must raise a
SYNTAX_ERR exception.
If a reflecting DOM attribute is a DOMString but
doesn't fall into any of the above categories, then the getting and
setting must be done in a transparent, case-preserving manner.
If a reflecting DOM attribute is a boolean attribute, then on getting the DOM attribute must return true if the attribute is set, and false if it is absent. On setting, the content attribute must be removed if the DOM attribute is set to false, and must be set to have the same value as its name if the DOM attribute is set to true. (This corresponds to the rules for boolean content attributes .)
If a reflecting DOM attribute is a signed integer type (
long ) then, on getting, the content attribute must be
parsed according to the rules for parsing signed
integers , and if that is successful, the resulting value must
be returned. If, on the other hand, it fails, or if the attribute
is absent, then the default value must be returned instead, or 0 if
there is no default value. On setting, the given value must be
converted to the shortest possible string representing the number
as a valid integer in base ten and then that
string must be used as the new content attribute value.
If a reflecting DOM attribute is an unsigned integer
type ( unsigned long ) then, on getting, the content
attribute must be parsed according to the rules for parsing
unsigned integers , and if that is successful, the resulting
value must be returned. If, on the other hand, it fails, or if the
attribute is absent, the default value must be returned instead, or
0 if there is no default value. On setting, the given value must be
converted to the shortest possible string representing the number
as a valid non-negative integer in base ten
and then that string must be used as the new content attribute
value.
If a reflecting DOM attribute is an unsigned integer type (
unsigned long ) that is limited to
only positive non-zero numbers , then the behavior is similar
to the previous case, but zero is not allowed. On getting, the
content attribute must first be parsed according to the rules
for parsing unsigned integers , and if that is successful, the
resulting value must be returned. If, on the other hand, it fails,
or if the attribute is absent, the default value must be returned
instead, or 1 if there is no default value. On setting, if the
value is zero, the user agent must fire an
INDEX_SIZE_ERR exception. Otherwise, the given value
must be converted to the shortest possible string representing the
number as a valid non-negative integer in base
ten and then that string must be used as the new content attribute
value.
If a reflecting DOM attribute is a floating point number type (
float ) and the content attribute is defined to
contain a time offset, then, on getting, the content attribute must
be parsed according to the rules for parsing time
ofsets , and if that is successful, the resulting value, in
seconds, must be returned. If that fails, or if the attribute is
absent, the default value must be returned, or the not-a-number
value (NaN) if there is no default value. On setting, the given
value, interpreted as a time offset in seconds, must be converted
to a string using the time offset
serialisation rules , and that string must be used as the new
content attribute value.
If a reflecting DOM attribute is a floating point number type (
float ) and it doesn't fall into one of the earlier
categories, then, on getting, the content attribute must be parsed
according to the rules for
parsing floating point number values , and if that is
successful, the resulting value must be returned. If, on the other
hand, it fails, or if the attribute is absent, the default value
must be returned instead, or 0.0 if there is no default value. On
setting, the given value must be converted to the shortest possible
string representing the number as a valid
floating point number in base ten and then that string must be
used as the new content attribute value.
If a reflecting DOM attribute is of the type DOMTokenList , then on getting it must
return a DOMTokenList
object whose underlying string is the element's corresponding
content attribute. When the DOMTokenList object mutates its
underlying string, the content attribute must itself be immediately
mutated. When the attribute is absent, then the string represented
by the DOMTokenList
object is the empty string; when the object mutates this empty
string, the user agent must first add the corresponding content
attribute, and then mutate that attribute instead. DOMTokenList attributes are always
read-only. The same DOMTokenList object must be returned
every time for each attribute.
If a reflecting DOM attribute has the type HTMLElement , or an interface that
descends from HTMLElement ,
then, on getting, it must run the following algorithm (stopping at
the first point where a value is returned):
document.getElementById() method would find
if it was passed as its argument the current value of the
corresponding content attribute.On setting, if the given element has an id attribute, then the content
attribute must be set to the value of that id attribute. Otherwise, the DOM
attribute must be set to the empty string.
The HTMLCollection ,
HTMLFormControlsCollection
, and HTMLOptionsCollection
interfaces represent various lists of DOM nodes. Collectively,
objects implementing these interfaces are called collections .
When a collection is created, a filter and a root are associated with the collection.
For example, when the HTMLCollection object for the
document.images attribute is created, it is
associated with a filter that selects only img elements, and rooted at the root of the
document.
The collection then represents a live view of the subtree rooted at the collection's root, containing only nodes that match the given filter. The view is linear. In the absence of specific requirements to the contrary, the nodes within the collection must be sorted in tree order .
The rows list is not in tree order.
An attribute that returns a collection must return the same object every time it is retrieved.
The HTMLCollection
interface represents a generic collection of
elements.
interface HTMLCollection {
readonly attribute unsigned long length;
[IndexGetter] Element item(in unsigned long index);
[NameGetter] Element namedItem(in DOMString name);
};
The length attribute
must return the number of nodes represented by the
collection .
The